"(c) THE THIRD PARTY : INTERIGHTS
112. Interights made the following general observations. It stated that it had carried out a survey of practices regarding placement of people with mental disorders in specialised institutions in central and east European countries. According to the conclusions of the survey, in most cases placement in such institutions could be regarded as amounting to a DE FACTO DEPRIVATION of LIBERTY.
113. Social care homes were often located in rural and mountainous areas which were not easy accessible. Where they were situated near urban areas, they were sorrounded by high walls or fences and the gates were kept locked. As a rule, residents were able to leave the premises only with the express permission of the director ot the home, and for a limited period. In case of unauthorised leave, the police had the power to search for and return the persons concerned. The same restrictive regime applied to all residents, without any distinction according to legal status - whether they had full , partial or no legal capacity - and in the view of Interights, this was a decisive factor. No consideration at all was given to whether the placement was voluntary or involuntary.
114. Regarding the analysis of the subjective aspect of the placement, Interights submitted that the consent of the persons concerned was a matter requiring careful attention. Thorough efforts should be made to ascertain their true wishes, notwithstanding any declaration of legal incapacity that might have been made in their case. Interights contended that in reality, when faced with a choice between a precarious, homeless existence and the relative security offered by a social care home, incapable persons in central and east European countries might opt for the latter solution, simply because no alternative services were offered by the State's social welfare system. That did not mean, however, that the persons concerned could be said to have freely consented to the placement."
http://www.interights.org/home/index.html
Wie hilfreich und gut, daß es diese wachsame Menschenrechtsorganisation gibt ! Wir werde diese nun gnadenlos förmlich "A N S E T Z E N " auf die haarsträubenden Miß - Stände hier im hochgradig verlogenen FELIX AUSTRIA , wo sich alle Verantwortlichen feige herumdrücken und ein jeder dem anderen diese Verantwortung zuschieben will und das Ganze rotiert dann ewig im Kreis herum................
In der gesamten Rechtsordnung der RES PUBLICA AUSTRIACA gibt es keinerlei Handhabe für die konsenslose Segregierung, Separierung und Internierung mental beeinträchtigter Mitmenschen in solchen "social care homes" - und doch wird damit ein Riesengeschäft gemacht, an dem Abertausende mitnaschen ! Die Salzburger Landesregierung betreibt seit Jahrzehnten einen förmlichen MENSCHENHANDEL in höchst fragwürdiger Kooperation mit dieser sagenhaft pervertierten "Lebenshilfe" und wie von Geisterhand sind in den vergangenen 40 Jahren Dutzende solcher "Social - Care - Homes - Schwammerl" aus dem Boden gewachsen. Mit welcher Rechtsgrundlage ??? Es findet sich nach wie vor kein einziges Sterbenswörtchen diesbezüglich im Salzburger Landesgesetz über die Behindertenhilfe !!! Es wurde also alles völlig freihändig und "praeter legem" vorbei ausgehandelt, ausgeschnapst und besiegelt. Im Landtag war das nicht einmal den angeblich GRÜNEN bislang eine entsprechende Aktion wert !
112. Interights made the following general observations. It stated that it had carried out a survey of practices regarding placement of people with mental disorders in specialised institutions in central and east European countries. According to the conclusions of the survey, in most cases placement in such institutions could be regarded as amounting to a DE FACTO DEPRIVATION of LIBERTY.
113. Social care homes were often located in rural and mountainous areas which were not easy accessible. Where they were situated near urban areas, they were sorrounded by high walls or fences and the gates were kept locked. As a rule, residents were able to leave the premises only with the express permission of the director ot the home, and for a limited period. In case of unauthorised leave, the police had the power to search for and return the persons concerned. The same restrictive regime applied to all residents, without any distinction according to legal status - whether they had full , partial or no legal capacity - and in the view of Interights, this was a decisive factor. No consideration at all was given to whether the placement was voluntary or involuntary.
114. Regarding the analysis of the subjective aspect of the placement, Interights submitted that the consent of the persons concerned was a matter requiring careful attention. Thorough efforts should be made to ascertain their true wishes, notwithstanding any declaration of legal incapacity that might have been made in their case. Interights contended that in reality, when faced with a choice between a precarious, homeless existence and the relative security offered by a social care home, incapable persons in central and east European countries might opt for the latter solution, simply because no alternative services were offered by the State's social welfare system. That did not mean, however, that the persons concerned could be said to have freely consented to the placement."
http://www.interights.org/home/index.html
Wie hilfreich und gut, daß es diese wachsame Menschenrechtsorganisation gibt ! Wir werde diese nun gnadenlos förmlich "A N S E T Z E N " auf die haarsträubenden Miß - Stände hier im hochgradig verlogenen FELIX AUSTRIA , wo sich alle Verantwortlichen feige herumdrücken und ein jeder dem anderen diese Verantwortung zuschieben will und das Ganze rotiert dann ewig im Kreis herum................
In der gesamten Rechtsordnung der RES PUBLICA AUSTRIACA gibt es keinerlei Handhabe für die konsenslose Segregierung, Separierung und Internierung mental beeinträchtigter Mitmenschen in solchen "social care homes" - und doch wird damit ein Riesengeschäft gemacht, an dem Abertausende mitnaschen ! Die Salzburger Landesregierung betreibt seit Jahrzehnten einen förmlichen MENSCHENHANDEL in höchst fragwürdiger Kooperation mit dieser sagenhaft pervertierten "Lebenshilfe" und wie von Geisterhand sind in den vergangenen 40 Jahren Dutzende solcher "Social - Care - Homes - Schwammerl" aus dem Boden gewachsen. Mit welcher Rechtsgrundlage ??? Es findet sich nach wie vor kein einziges Sterbenswörtchen diesbezüglich im Salzburger Landesgesetz über die Behindertenhilfe !!! Es wurde also alles völlig freihändig und "praeter legem" vorbei ausgehandelt, ausgeschnapst und besiegelt. Im Landtag war das nicht einmal den angeblich GRÜNEN bislang eine entsprechende Aktion wert !
INTERIGHTS MÖGE DIE PATRONANZ ÜBERNEHMEN FÜR WOLFGANG AUF DEM WEGE NACH STRASSBURG !
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen